I understand that for the purpose of movement, each space on tiles with multiple spaces is like a separate tile. But for the purpose of ATTACK, is the whole tile counted as one tile? See pictures for examples: Solo Player is Blue, on this turn drew and played a tile, a card, then had his Blue Hero move just north of the Red Troll, then attack the Red Troll, leaving said Hero with 3 Health. Now following the steps on page 18: Goblin has nothing to attack Troll attacked-back so no action for it Orc MAY have opportunity to Charge-Attack the Blue Hero… 1: Orc on near side of bridge with tile between Orc and Hero. I think the Orc can do the charge-attack. One move takes it to the tile adjacent to the Hero. Bam. 2: Orc on far side of bridge with no tile between Orc and Hero. Again I think the Orc can do the charge-attack. One move takes it to the near side of the bridge, so still on the tile adjacent to the Hero. Bam bam. 3: Orc on tile opposite the bridge tile. Now this was the situation I found myself in. I initially thought the Orc should not be able to charge-attack. To do so it is supposed to move one tile to get to a tile adjacent to its target. But then I thought this situation is similar to 2, and though the Orc’s one move lands it two “movement spaces” from the Hero, it IS in the TILE adjacent to the Hero. BUT then I thought, it IS on the far side of the bridge, so can it really reach the Hero for a melee attack? I reasoned it would NOT have the reach, sparing my Hero an untimely death. Am I playing this correctly? PS if the Enemy were a Goblin, not an Orc: 1: Goblin on near side of bridge with tile between Goblin and Hero. Goblin has Range, can shoot the Hero. Phwoop. 3: Goblin on tile opposite the bridge tile. Goblin can definitely attack. Phwoop phwoop. 2: Goblin on far side of bridge with no tile between Goblin and Hero. I think the Goblin can attack. And if it is considered not really adjacent it will be using Range and the Hero it cannot attack-back. BUT, they ARE in adjacent tiles. Sooooooo… no???

Very much enjoying Dungeon War. Played my first solo game. Rules all very clear. I did have one question about Doors in solo play: can an Enemy that has not back attacked or attacked use its move to remove an adjacent door? See photo. 1.Solo Player is Green. Drew and placed tile, then drew and played Door 2. Enemy Orc spawned as per card’s solo instruction. 3. Only the lower right Green Hero can move. However, neither can attack. 4. Enemy Troll and Goblin were a serious threat to the Green Hero, who is now safely behind the door... Neither Enemy can attack but can the Troll use its move to open the door?

I like using the Overkill mechanic during my dungeon crawls, so while playing World Builder and encountering Prey Monsters when failing hunting, I thought it would be fun to add the overkill mechanic to that as well. Ordinarily if you fail the Hunt but succeed in killing the Prey Monster, you get half rations, rounded down, plus the bonus for the month. So my thought was to increase your rations gained sequentially, up to a maximum of what you would have earned if the Hunt was a success. The max Rations you can get from Hunting is in the Forest or Grasslands in August or September for 11 rations (9 for the area plus 2 for the month), while the min Rations would be Hunting in the Desert in January for 3 Rations (5-2). But failing the Hunt, you half (rounded down) before the month bonus, so in that case failing a Hunt in the Desert in January would mean no rations, even if you kill the Prey Monster (1/2 of 5 rounded down = 2, - 2 for Jan = 0). And that’s actually quite reasonable. But if you Overkill, maybe you get a little something. My basic idea was that if you Overkill the Prey Monster by…   Less than 10 HP, you get 1/2 rations, as usual   10-11 HP, you get (roughly) 2/3 the rations   12-13 HP, you get 3/4 the rations   14+, you get the full rations you would have if the Hunt was a success. Below is a table I made. Note I rounded up or down to keep the table simple and sequential. Note also the range is 5 to 9 rations, based on what full rations are BEFORE applying the month bonus. So don’t forget to modify the result by the month bonus after consulting the table. For instance, Hunting in January will still apply minus 2, so if you are in the Desert (baseline 5R) that means as little as 0 rations, up to 3 on an overkill of 14+.

Anyone else thinking about adding property to the world builder expansion? I have not added any mounts yet, so they are probably a reasonable substitute, and maybe even a better one considering you are a traveling adventurer. Anyway, my thought was to add Buy a Property as a separate “Action” costing 1 AP. You can only buy properties in a Village, Town, or City. I considered adding it to the Settlement Action, but that already includes a lot of activities for one day. However, I was inspired by the mechanics of the Settlement Action, in that all property types would be available in a city, but not so much in a town or village, and not at all in a camp. So if you are in a hex with a Village, Town, or City, you can spend 1 AP shopping for a property. Note probability of finding said property type, and the cost difference as well. In the Lost Tome rules, at the start of Before your next Quest you check to see if your property has been robbed, then you pay for up keep, and buy extra security points if desired. For World Builder, I’m thinking put a little “house-shape” in the hex your property is in, then, if you are in the hex of your property, you can and would use your property daily, so no need to spend APs to deposit or withdraw items to and from it, and no need to test for theft. However, when you are in other hexes, I guess testing for theft monthly is reasonable. Maybe circle the day you purchase the property and then circle that day each month going forward as a reminder to test for theft on that day. You could even “circle” those days with a “house-shape.” On those days also pay for upkeep, and add security if desired. Would love to hear everyone’s thoughts!